She also advocates for the government to stop its continued systematic experimentation on animals. Firstly, animal testing is not as accurate and effective as one could think. These tiered rounds of testing are used to reduce the amount of mistakes and negative side effects in all breakthroughs. The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, states it's unethical to test on human volunteers unnecessarily before first Animal experimentation has been a commonly debated subject for many years, is it cruelty or science? To kill a lab rat. Animal research has helped us as humans make huge medical advances. It is true that the question of ethics arises when we talk about these experiments on animals. Some believe that the goals of this type of testing are not significant.
A more effective method would be to introduce counterpoints to each of the pros of using animal testing, which would show a strong understanding of both sides of the argument and make their point-of-view more convincing. These tests are performed without strict regulations on the procedures that can be practiced or the way animals are treated. Animal research, or animal testing, is the use of animals in scientific researches to develop drugs for the life-taking diseases that human beings contract. There should be other ways to test products instead of using animals. Most illnesses that were drastic in the past have been treated and cured using animals as test subject. There are many people who agree with the idea of animal testing, people who strongly disagree with animal testing, and people who are unaware of the problem and have no personal opinion about the issue.
Animals are kept in terrible conditions that presuppose constant painful and life-threatening experiments. That being said, the current rulings and principles of this form of scientific research are being challenged by different countries worldwide. Until we have a better system, we must use animal testing. These groups advocate for alternative testing methods to prohibit animal testing. Larger animals, such as dogs, cats, and primates typically live in wire cages which is an issue for these intelligent animals because they become extremely lonely and bored without toys to play with or ways to exercise.
Animal testing can be misleading since they are put under stressful situations causing them to be inaccurate. To conclude, I feel that animal testing is not right and I am against the current animal testing system, which is mandatory by law. Animal testing is a global issue, which has gained sufficient traction over the years as cruel, and a method that needs Over 100 million animals are killed each year by money-hungry corporations just to test animals for products. Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. At the same time, the computer-modelling techniques and in—vitro methods are much effective and less expensive. We do not have alternative methods of testing.
Animal testing: Right or Wrong? Activist for the protection of animal argue that animal testing is cruel and harms, injures and maims the innocent animals. They argue that alternative methods should be developed to prohibit the need for animal testing. One could argue the practice of this is inaccurate, and there are multiple other ways for testing on things that would be more accurate and would not harm the animals. In the laboratory environment, the average animal spends it days locked away in a constricting cage while being put through gruesome experiments. The term animal testing is the process of subjecting animal to clinical trials before conducting human trials. Their bodies respond to disease and treatments much as ours do. Generally people believe that animal testing is done and small rodents such as rats and mice.
Vaccines, medicines, and cures are discovered with animal testing, but the practice of using would you feel? Taking all the arguments into consideration, it is completely clear that animal testing should be abandoned since it has reached the limit of its usefulness that could at least partially justify its usage. This drug was declared safe in stopping or controlling diarrhea in 1970s in Japan. Animal testing also cost a huge amount of resources and money considering that the animals must be fed, treated, housed etc for a certain period, which is relatively long. It was a highly rated sedative for breastfeeding and pregnant mothers because the scientists involved argued that it affects neither the mother nor the child Hackman 123. Animal Testing Must Be Eliminated Testing on animals should be eliminated for various reasons. On the other hand, opponents or individuals who challenge the concept of animal experimentation argue that animals, like humans, feel and experience pain and should not be subjected to unnecessary pain and suffering.
As I have gotten older I found a new appreciation for the art of makeup and how I am able to express myself through a certain color of lipstick or eyeshadow. Therefore, testing on animals provides no real results for human study. Imagine yourself as your pet, but instead of living in a warm home with a caring family, you live locked up in a small metal cage, only being let out to swallow harmful chemicals, to be poked and prodded with needles, and to be injected with chemicals. The second reason is that there is no real advantage to animal testing because they are not homologous to humans. Animals used for testing in laboratories endure this kind of treatment every day. This page offers a variety of pro and con quotes about animal testing from authors, doctors, professors, and other credible professionals.
Most of these to mind when they hear animal testing. Written by a cardiologist, this article provides a brief overview of the history of animal testing but ultimately argues that animal testing is necessary and beneficial. These are a few things that happen to animals that are used for research and although animal research has helped to find cures for some virisus, such as polio, there are more efficient and ethical ways to do so that do not involve the suffering of innocent creatures. In addition, the United States Department of Agriculture conduct surprising inspections of dealers and research facilities for agreement to help ensure research animals are not missing pets. The artificial corneas or skin can be used to perform credible tests without any harm being made to the living beings.
Experiments classify the pain as being mild, moderate, severe, or unclassified. Alternatives to animal testing could be cadavers or human tissue samples. A further point often raised against animal testing is that it is cruel. Like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction. Both dealers and research facilities can obtain dogs and cats only from specified sources and must comply with detailed record-keeping and waiting-period requirements. Posted on Author Categories Tags , , Post navigation Copyright © 2008-2019 Writing-Expert. Imagine a small dog or rodent locked in a cage wondering when the next fearful treatment will happen.